On October 7, 2011, two motions in the matter of Joanne St. Lewis v. Denis Rancourt were heard before The Honourable Mr. Justice McKinnon at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Ottawa, Elgin Street courthouse).
The plaintiff was represented by attorney Richard Dearden and his Gowlings team. The defendant was self-represented.
Given the open court principle in our society, the public is entitled to know exactly all that was said in court and the ruling of the judge.
This way, the public can judge the degree to which the courts and justice system behave fairly.
You can follow the October 7, 2011 in-court action via this accurate official transcript of the proceedings: PART-1, PART-2.
The rulings on the two motions are here: Motion-1, Motion-3.
Mr. Dearden stated in court that he intends to use the hearing transcript itself as evidence of malice against the defendant in the main defamation action. He also made it clear that he intended to get the defendant to pay costs: "you should not in any way be swayed by the submissions that he has been unemployed [...] but regardless, he's got a house and he's in litigation [...]"
This transcript gives a representation of the nature of the plaintiff's lawsuit being funded by the University of Ottawa, and of the Court's reaction to the litigation even in these procedural motions.
As background, all related posts about the lawsuit are HERE.
Links to all pleadings and court documents in the lawsuit are HERE.
Links to all pleadings and court documents in the lawsuit are HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment